SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 12212

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
JAMES JOSEPH – Appellant
Versus
THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER MUVATTUPUZHA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 6281 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.MUHAMMED SHAFFI, SHRI.ASWIN MANOJ
For the Respondents: SR GP, SMT VIDYA KURIAKOSE

The court mandates timely consideration of applications under the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, emphasizing procedural compliance by authorities.

Headnote:This judgment discusses a writ petition under the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, 2008, seeking a Mandamus for the timely consideration of an application. The petitioner requested a directive for a swift response from the revenue authorities to the Form-6 application. The court found merit in the request and ordered a timeframe for compliance.

Table of Content
1. seeking relief under the kerala conservation of paddy land and wetland act. (Para 1 , 2)
2. court heard arguments regarding procedural compliance. (Para 3)
3. court issued directives for timely action on applications. (Para 4)

JUDGMENT

This writ petition is filed seeking the following reliefs:

“(i) Issue a Writ in the nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, order or direction directing the 1st Respondent or the Authorized officer under Section 2 (xvA) of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, 2008 to consider and pass orders on Exhibit P3 Application in accordance with law within the shortest time period as possible.

(ii) To dispense with filing of the translation of Vernacular Documents.

(iii) Allow the Writ petition with costs.

(iv) Grant such other further reliefs which this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to direct in the facts and circumstances of the case.” [SIC]

2. The main prayer in this Writ Petition is to consider Ext.P3 Form-6 application filed by the petitioner under Section 27A read with Rule 12(1) of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act and Rules, 2008 ('Act and Rules' in short).

3. Heard, the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.

4. After hearing both sides, I think there can be a direction to consider Ext.P3 within a time frame.

Therefore, this Writ Petition is disposed of in the following manner:

1. The 3rd respondent is directed to submit the necessary report based on Ext.P3 Form-6 application to the 2nd respondent / Authorised Officer within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment.

2. The 2nd respondent / Authorised O directed to consider Ext.P3 Form-6 application (if it is pending and if it is in order) based on the report received from the 3rd respondent, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of four months from the date of receipt of the report. I make it clear that the 2nd respondent is free to pass appropriate orders in accordance with the law.

3. The petitioner will produce a certified copy of this judgment, along with a copy of this Writ Petition with exhibits, before the 2nd and 3rd respondents for compliance.

Sd/-

P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, JUDGE nvj

Judgment reserved NA
Date of judgment 19.02.2026
Judgment dictated 19.02.2026
Draft Judgment Placed 20.02.2026
Final Judgment Uploaded 21.02.2026
APPENDIX OF WP(C) NO. 6281 OF 2026 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit- P1 TRUE COPY OF THE BASIC TAX RECEIPT DATED 11-06-2024 ISSUED BY 3RD RESPONDENT.

Exhibit- P2 TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS DATED

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top