IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
P.K.IBRAHIM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to stop memo based on ownership rights. (Para 2) |
| 2. village officer's authority questioned regarding the issuance of stop memo. (Para 3) |
JUDGMENT
The above writ petition is filed with the following prayers:
“(a) Issue a writ of certiorari or other appropriate writ or direction calling for the records leading to Exhibit.P3 stop memo and quash the same.
(b) Grant such other reliefs as this Hon’ble Court deems fit on facts and circumstances of the case.
(c) Award cost of the proceedings.” (SIC)
2. The petitioner is the absolute owner of
15.23 Ares of unnotified land is the submission. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Fort Kochi issued Ext.P1 order in a Form-6 application submitted by the petitioner in accordance with Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act , 2008 (for short “Act 2008”). Consequently, the 2nd respondent Village Officer made necessary changes in the revenue records and made endorsement to the effect that “സ്വഭാവ വ്യതിയാനം വരുത്തിയ പുരയിടം" as evident by Ext.P2 is the submission. When the petitioner attempted to level the land to make it suitable for construction of building, the 2nd respondent issued Ext.P3 stop memo. Aggrieved by the sa
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.