SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 12333

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
MUHAMMED JALAL. A.M – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SMT.R.RANJANIE, SMT.MEERA M.
For the Respondents: SHRI.D.G.VIPIN, SRI.K.V.SREE VINAYAKAN, SHRI.K.M.MUHAMMED HUSSAIN, SMT.VIDYA KURIAKOSE, GP

JUDGMENT

When this writ petition came up for consideration, the counsel for the petitioners sought permission to withdraw the writ petition because the matter had been settled out of court. Permission granted. Therefore, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top