Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 12333

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
MUHAMMED JALAL. A.M – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 29775 OF 2024

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SMT.R.RANJANIE, SMT.MEERA M.
For the Respondents: SHRI.D.G.VIPIN, SRI.K.V.SREE VINAYAKAN, SHRI.K.M.MUHAMMED HUSSAIN, SMT.VIDYA KURIAKOSE, GP

Withdrawal of a writ petition is permissible upon the resolution of the matter out of court, showcasing judicial discretion.

Headnote:The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking relief. The court granted permission to withdraw the petition as the matter was settled out of court. The ruling indicates judicial acceptance of resolution outside court settings, reflecting the court's discretion in administrative judicial proceedings. Final outcome: this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

JUDGMENT

When this writ petition came up for consideration, the counsel for the petitioners sought permission to withdraw the writ petition because the matter had been settled out of court. Permission granted. Therefore, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 12333

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMP.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, JMUHAMMED JALAL. A.M – AppellantVersusSTATE OF KERALA – RespondentWP(C) NO. 29775 OF 2024

Withdrawal of a writ petition is permissible upon the resolution of the matter out of court, showcasing judicial discretion.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
MUHAMMED JALAL. A.M – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 29775 OF 2024