Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, BASANT BALAJI, JJ
MATHEW IDICULLA – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. review petition filed for delayed relief (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments regarding the explanation of delay and continuing cause of action (Para 3) |
| 3. opposition based on inordinate delay in approach (Para 4) |
| 4. review provisions under cpc (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 5. judicial interpretations related to review applications and errors (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 6. no error found to warrant review (Para 19) |
| 7. judicial stance on delay and laches in judicial proceedings (Para 20 , 22) |
| 8. final order of dismissal of review petition (Para 23) |
ORDER
Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari, J
The present Review Petition is filed under Order XLVII Rule 1 read with Section 114 of the Code of Civil Procedure , 1908, seeking review of the judgment dated 12.09.2025 in O.P. (CAT) No. 101/2025, whereby the Original Petition filed by the petitioners was dismissed on the ground of delay and laches.
2. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioners approached the Central Administrative Tribunal, Ernakulam Bench in O.A. No. 180/0096/2024 seeking a direction to the respondents to re-fix their pay in the scale of Rs. 330–480 for the period of the Third Pay Revision and to grant cons
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
