Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BASANT BALAJI, J
GOPAKUMARAPILLAI – Appellant
Versus
DISTRICT REGISTRAR (GENERAL) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner challenges cancellation of a sale deed. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court directs authority to consider reply and hold hearing. (Para 4) |
JUDGMENT
(Dated this the 10th day of February, 2026)
The petitioner seeks to challenge the action initiated by the 1st respondent for cancellation of the sale deed executed by the petitioner. In this writ petition, the petitioner challenges Ext.P4, which is a communication dated 14.05.2025 issued by respondent No.1 to the petitioner, calling upon him to appear for a hearing on 21.05.2025 at 11.00 a.m. The petitioner has submitted his reply to the said communication by Ext.P5 dated
17.05.2025.
2. The learned Government Pleader submitted that, pursuant to the reply submitted by the petitioner, no further action has been initiated and, therefore, there is no cause of action for the petitioner to approach this Court by filing the present writ petition.
3. It is evident that when a notice has been issued by the
1st respondent and a reply has been submitted by the petitioner, the 1st respondent is bound to consider the said reply and take an appropriate decision after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. As on date, the said
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
