SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 12491

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
ARUN KRISHNAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.P.S.BINU, SMT.K.SEENA
For the Respondents: SMT. SEETHA S.

Dated this the 23rd day of February, 2026 ORDER The petitioner is the accused in C.C. No.151/2022 on the file of the Court of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kasaragod (Trial Court),which has originated from Crime No. 10/2016 Kasaragod Police Station, (Vigilance & Anti Corruption Bureau), alleging the commission of the offence punishable under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code .

2. The petitioner has stated in the Criminal Miscellaneous Case that, he was enlarged on bail at the crime stage. Subsequently, the case was adjourned for framing of charge. However, as petitioner is permanently employed abroad, he could not appear before the Trial Court. The petitioner has learnt that a non-bailable warrant has been issued against him, The petitioner is willing to surrender before the Trial Court and get himself enlarged on bail. However, the petitioner is apprehensive that his application may not be considered on the same day and he may be remanded to judicial custody. Hence, the Crl.M.C.

3. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor

4. On a consideration of the facts and the materials on record, without expressing anything on the merits of the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top