IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
TITO M.A. – Appellant
Versus
THE JOINT REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER – Respondent
J U D G M E N T
The writ petition is filed with the following prayers;
“i) Issue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction orders directing the 1st respondent to consider Exhibit P-1 request submitted by the petitioner for the issuance of NOC in respect of stage carriage KL-12C-2827 and issue the same forthwith;
ii) Declare that the registration of Crime No.1376/2022 by the 2nd respondent and pendency of the criminal case and the matter before the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal cannot be a ground to deny the NOC.
iii) To dispense with the production of English Translation of documents which are in vernacular language;
iv) Render such other orders or direction as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.”
2. The learned Government Pleader submits that statutory applications, the petitioner has to file, for obtaining an NOC under Section 48 of the Motor Vehicles Act , read with Rule 58 of the Central Motor Vehicles Rules have not been preferred by the petitioner.
3. Though the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the pendency of a claim petition before the Tribunal or the registration of a criminal case cannot
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.