SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 12508

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
VIJU ABRAHAM, J
P C PRASAD – Appellant
Versus
PRADEEP KUMAR T. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SMT.SREEDEVI S, SHRI.V.G.SURESH, SHRI.ANANDHU SATHEESH, SMT.DRISYA DILEEP
For the Respondents: SMT.NIMA JACOB

JUDGMENT

The petitioner has approached this Court alleging non-compliance of the directions in Annexure A1 judgment.

2. The learned Government Pleader has produced a copy of the proceedings of the Additional Registering Authority, Ranni along with a Memo dated 10.02.2026.

In the light of the proceedings now issued, this contempt of Court case stands closed, leaving it open to the petitioner to challenge the same in accordance with law in appropriate proceedings, if so aggrieved.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top