SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 12524

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
ALIF ANZIL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 2850 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.M.MUHAMMED SHAFI, SMT.T.RASINI, SMT.RAMEESA RASHEED, SMT.HIBA SHAMAR
For the Respondents: ADV.RAJEEV JYOTHISH GEORGE- GOVERNMENT PLEADER

The Court emphasizes the necessity for timely resolution of pending administrative representations.

Headnote:The petitioner seeks to be declared eligible for inclusion in the management committee of a school, claiming to be an heir. The Court determines that the pending representation should be resolved expeditiously. The relevant order mandates considering the representation within three months after proper hearings.

Table of Content
1. petitioner claims eligibility based on heirship. (Para 1 , 2)
2. court mandates timely disposal of representations. (Para 3 , 4)

JUDGMENT

The petitioner claims to be the eldest son of late Mr.Anzil M. Anwar, who was the eldest son of late Mrs.Surayya. The petitioner seeks for a direction to declare him to be eligible to be included in the management committee of MRMKMMHSS, Edava, Thiruvananthapuram, being the late heir of Mrs.Surayya. Seeking appropriate orders regarding the managership of the school, the petitioner has filed Ext.P4 representation before the DEO.

2. The limited relief sought for by the petitioner at the time of hearing, is for a direction to dispose of Ext.P4 representation in a time bound manner.

3. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Government Pleader, I am of the view that considering the nature of relief sought for, notice to the 5th respondent can be dispensed with.

4. Since Ext.P4 representation is pending consideration, this Court is of the view that the same can be directed to be disposed of in a time bound manner, after hearing all the parties.

Accordingly, there will be a direction to the 4th respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P4 representation as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment after granting an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, to the 5th respondent as well as any person, who could be affected by the claim raised by the petitioner.

This writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top