Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 12527

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
KARTHIK P.LAL – Appellant
Versus
THE CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 6383 OF 2026

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.SABU GEORGE, SRI.P.B.SUBRAMANYAN, SRI.MANU VYASAN PETER, SMT.CHITRA JOHNSON
For the Respondents: SRI.AJIT JOY

A petitioner can withdraw a writ petition leading to its dismissal as not pressed without further proceedings.

Headnote:In the context of the writ petition under WP

(C) No. 6383 of 2026, the petitioner expressed an intention not to pursue the matter, leading to the court's dismissal of the petition as not pressed. The court's finding reflects the voluntary withdrawal of the petition. The ultimate ruling is the dismissal of the writ petition.

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that petitioners does not intend to pursue the writ petition.

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 12527

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMBECHU KURIAN THOMAS, JKARTHIK P.LAL – AppellantVersusTHE CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION – RespondentWP(C) NO. 6383 OF 2026

A petitioner can withdraw a writ petition leading to its dismissal as not pressed without further proceedings.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
KARTHIK P.LAL – Appellant
Versus
THE CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 6383 OF 2026