Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 12534

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
M/S. MATHEW'S MEDICALS STORES – Appellant
Versus
THE DRUG CONTROLLER – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 37570 OF 2025

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.K.B.GANGESH, SMT.SMITHA CHATHANARAMBATH, SMT.ATHIRA A.MENON, SHRI.HARISANKAR.K.V.
For the Respondents: ADV. DHEERAJ A.S.

A petition can be dismissed as not pressed when the petitioners indicate they do not wish to pursue the case further.

Headnote:The court considered the writ petition filed under WP

(C) NO. 37570 OF 2025, where the petitioners intended to withdraw their petition. The court examined the submission of the counsel regarding the petitioners not pursuing the case, resulting in a dismissal of the writ petition as not pressed. The final verdict of the court is reflective of the non-pursuance by the petitioners.

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that petitioners do not intend to pursue the writ petition.

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.

Sd/-

BECHU KURIAN THOMAS JUDGE

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 12534

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMBECHU KURIAN THOMAS, JM/S. MATHEW'S MEDICALS STORES – AppellantVersusTHE DRUG CONTROLLER – RespondentWP(C) NO. 37570 OF 2025

A petition can be dismissed as not pressed when the petitioners indicate they do not wish to pursue the case further.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
M/S. MATHEW'S MEDICALS STORES – Appellant
Versus
THE DRUG CONTROLLER – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 37570 OF 2025