Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.PRATHEEP KUMAR, J
ANZAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition filed by accused for quashing proceedings. (Para 1) |
| 2. retraction of settlement by complainant affects proceedings. (Para 2) |
| 3. court emphasized the necessity for timely disposal. (Para 3) |
| 4. final ruling to dismiss and direct resolution. (Para 4) |
O R D E R Dated this the 20th day of February, 2026 The accused persons in CC. No.1821/2019 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-II, Kollam, arising from crime No.251/2018 of Eravipuram Police Station, filed this Crl.M.C. under Section 482 Cr.P.C. praying for quashing all further proceedings against the petitioners on the ground that the matter has been settled with the defacto complainant.
2. When this matter came up for arguments, the learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that now the defacto complainant has retracted from the promise to settle the dispute. In the above circumstances this Crl.M.C. is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to raise all contentions before the trial court.
3. At this stage, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that since this is a case of the year 2019, a direction be issued to the learned Magistrate to dispose of the same in a time bound ma
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
