Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 12541

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.PRATHEEP KUMAR, J
GANESH G. NAIR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
CRL.MC NO. 5419 OF 2020

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.M.P.MADHAVANKUTTY, SHRI. SHIJOY JOHN MATHEW
For the Respondents: SR. PP. SRI. BREEZ.M.S

Court determined the matter as infructuous, leading to dismissal of the case.

Headnote:The court analyzed the legal status of the petition based on the argument that the matter had become infructuous. The facts indicate that a criminal misc. case was filed following a FIR in 2018. The court, upon reviewing the submission, found sufficient grounds to dismiss the case as infructuous. The issues framed included whether the case should proceed given its status, leading to a conclusion that dismissal was appropriate.

ORDER

Dated this the 20^th day of February, 2026 The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the matter has become infructuous and hence this Crl.M.C could be dismissed as infructuous.

In the light of the above submission, this Crl.M.C is dismissed as infructuous.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 12541

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMC.PRATHEEP KUMAR, JGANESH G. NAIR – AppellantVersusSTATE OF KERALA – RespondentCRL.MC NO. 5419 OF 2020

Court determined the matter as infructuous, leading to dismissal of the case.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.PRATHEEP KUMAR, J
GANESH G. NAIR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
CRL.MC NO. 5419 OF 2020