SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 12545

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C. PRATHEEP KUMAR, J
NIJIN THOMAS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
CRL.MC NO. 8681 OF 2023 | CRIME NO.350/2019



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SMT.MERSEENA VINCENT
For the Respondents: PP SMT. C.SEENA

A case previously adjudicated renders subsequent quashing petitions under Section 482 Cr.P.C. infructuous.

Headnote:The court analysed the petitioner’s prayer under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. to quash proceedings based on the premise that the case was previously disposed. The court noted the absence of the petitioner during the hearing. As a result, the court found the petition infructuous. The dismissal was affirmed as stated, 'Therefore, this Crl.M.C. became infructuous and accordingly it is dismissed as infructuous.'

ORDER

Dated this the 20th day of February, 2026 Petitioner absent without any representation. The accused in C.C.No.8681/2023 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-II, Aluva, arising out of Crime No.350/2019 of Aluva East police station, filed this Crl.M.C. under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying for quashing all further proceedings against him.

On verification of CMS, it is revealed that this case was already disposed of by the trial court. Therefore, this Crl.M.C. became infructuous and accordingly it is dismissed as infructuous.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top