SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 12547

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.PRATHEEP KUMAR, J
TONY JOSEPH V. FRANCIS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
CRL.MC NO. 10923 OF 2023



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.B.PRAMOD, SHRI.BIJU VIGNESWAR
For the Respondents: SMT. C.SEENA

The court correctly dismissed the case as infructuous based on the petitioners' submissions.

Headnote:The court examined the submissions by the learned counsel for the petitioners, indicating that the Criminal Miscellaneous Case had become infructuous. The court ultimately ruled that based on the petitioners' counsel's claims, the case would be dismissed. The court framed the following question: 'Whether the case should be dismissed due to its infructuous nature?' The court concluded that the dismissing of the Criminal Miscellaneous Case as infructuous was warranted.

ORDER

Dated this the 20th day of February, 2026 The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that this Crl.M.C has become infructuous and hence it can be dismissed. In the light of the above submission, this Crl.M.C is dismissed as infructuous.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top