IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN, M.B. SNEHALATHA, JJ
VIMAL V.T – Appellant
Versus
DEEPA M.S – Respondent
Devan Ramachandran, J.
The petitioner challenges the endorsement on Ext.P3 made by the learned Judge of the learned Family Court, Kottayam at Ettumanoor, to the effect that the Original Petition presented by him, cannot be maintained before it for lack of territorial jurisdiction.
2. We cannot entertain this Original Petition without the order being produced; and, what we see is that the application has been given back to the petitioner by the learned Family Court, who has then taken a copy of the order written behind it and produced before us.
In the afore circumstances, we dismiss this Original Petition; however, leaving full liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh one, with a copy of the order annexed as per law.
Sd/-
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.