SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 12555

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
G. GIRISH, J
LEELA & ANR. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.A.C.DEVY
For the Respondents: SRI SANAL P. RAJ

ORDER

The concurrent findings of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-III, Thrissur, and the Additional Sessions Court (ADHOC),Fast Track, Thrissur, in C.C.No.1116/2001 and Crl.Appeal No.904/2005 respectively, convicting and sentencing the petitioners for the commission of offences under Sections 447 and 324 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 , are under challenge in this revision.

2. The prosecution case is that on 26.07.2001 at about 5.00 p.m, the petitioners, in furtherance of their common intention, criminally trespassed into the courtyard of the residence of PW2, and inflicted voluntary hurt upon PW1 by hitting with a wooden log and biting upon his right forefinger and right forearm. The second petitioner is also alleged to have wrongfully restrained PW1. With regard to the above incident, the Sub Inspector of Police, Peechi, filed the Final Report alleging the commission of offences under Sections 447, 341 and

324 IPC r/w Section 34 .

3. In the trial before the learned Magistrate, eight witnesses were examined as PW1 to PW8, and three documents were marked as Exts.P1 to P3. From the part of the accused, two witnesses were examined as DW1 and DW2. It is after analysing the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top