SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 12556

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
HARISANKAR V. MENON, J
PUSHKARAN. P.V – Appellant
Versus
RAVI SHANKAR.S – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.G.SIVASANKAR, SMT.ASHA S.V, SMT.GAYATHRI S.B
For the Respondents: Smt. Latha Anand

JUDGMENT

[Con.Case(C) Nos.50/2025, 52/2025, 55/2025, 61/2025, 65/2025, 66/2025, 69/2025, 81/2025]

Heard Sri G. Sivasankar, the learned counsel for the petitioners, as well as Smt. Latha Anand, the learned counsel for the respondent.

2. Both sides point out that the directions contained in the judgment have already been complied with by the respondent herein.

In the light of the afore, these Contempt of Court Cases are closed.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top