SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 12560

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
HARISANKAR V. MENON, J
ABDUL KAREEM B.K. – Appellant
Versus
THE DISTRICT POLICE CHIEF MALAPPURAM – Respondent
WP(C) NO.8315 OF 2023



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.P.SAMSUDIN, SMT.MILAN RACHEL MATHEW
For the Respondents: SRI.N.B. SUNIL NATH, SRI.NAVANEETH.N.NATH, SRI.K.S.STEJO, SHRI.SANEL CHERIAN, SMT.ABHIRAMI S., SHRI.IBRAHIM KUTTY C.

The court acknowledges the petitioners' right to seek protection and future assistance from law enforcement in situations of perceived threat.

Headnote:The petitioners, alleging repeated attempts on their lives by the 3rd respondent, filed a complaint with the police. Upon hearing the parties, the court noted the respondent's assurance of no current threat and disposed of the writ petition. Key legal questions involved the safety and future recourse of the petitioners against the 3rd respondent's actions. The court concluded that the petitioners could approach the police if necessary, establishing a course for protective measures.

Table of Content
1. petitioners allege attempts on their lives. (Para 1 , 2)
2. court records assurance of no current threat. (Para 3)
3. court allows future recourse to police. (Para 4)

JUDGMENT

The petitioners are husband and wife. The third respondent herein is stated to be the brother of the 1st petitioner. The petitioners contended that the 3rd respondent has attempted to commit murder of the petitioners and their family on many occasions. Stating thus, the petitioners have already approached the 1st and 2nd respondents, by filing Ext.P3 complaint.

2. Heard Sri.P.Shamsudin, learned counsel for the petitioners Sri.N.B. Sunil Nath, learned Government Pleader for respondents 1 and 2, and Sri.Navaneeth N. Nath, learned counsel for the 3rd respondent herein.

3. While admitting the writ petition on 10.03.2023, this Court had only issued notice to the 3rd respondent herein, directing the learned Government Pleader to get instructions.

4. The learned Government Pleader, on the basis of the instructions received by him, states that, as of now, there is no threat from the side of the 3rd respondent herein to the petitioners herein. The afore submission made by the learned Government Pleader is recorded.

In the light of the above, this writ petition would stand disposed of. However, the petitioners would be entitled to approach the 2nd respondent herein if necessity arises in the future.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top