IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
HARISANKAR V. MENON, J
SUDHEER P.M – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
JUDGMENT
The petitioner is stated to be the owner in possession of 5.58 Ares in Sy.No.1045/1 of Kothamangalam Village. Since the petitioner noticed that the property was classified as wet land as per the Data Bank, he submitted an application under the provisions of Section 27A of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wet Land Act, 2008 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) for using the property for other purposes.
2. By the order at Ext.P1 dated 21.02.2022, the Revenue Divisional Officer (RDO) accepted the application on the petitioner remitting an amount of Rs.8,06,400/-. The Tahsildar also passed proceedings changing the description of the petitioner’s property as purayidam in the Basic Tax Register (BTR). The petitioner, on the basis of the afore, sought a building permit from the local authority for constructing a commercial building. On the basis of the building permit issued, when the petitioner had commenced construction, the 5th respondent Village Officer issued Ext.P5 stop memo. It is seeking to challenge the stop memo issued as above that the petitioner has approached this Court through the captioned writ petition.
3. Heard Sri Peeyus A. Kottam, the learned counse
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.