Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 12574

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM, J
T.RAVINDRAN – Appellant
Versus
MANANTHAVADY GRAMA PANCHAYATH – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 5892 OF 2015

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.ABRAHAM MATHEW (VETTOOR), SRI.ANIL ABEY JOSE, SMT.BINI ELIZABETH
For the Respondents: SHRI.MANOJ RAMASWAMY, SRI.P.A.HARISH, SMT.REKHA ARAVIND, SHRI.V.V.SURENDRAN, SRI.SANTHARAM.P

The dismissal of a writ petition due to becoming infructuous concludes the need for judicial relief.

Headnote:The court analyzed the petitioners' claims concerning notices issued by the authorities, considering them now infructuous due to the lack of necessity for relief. The essential findings led to the dismissal of the writ petition. It was stated that the 'matter has become infructuous'. The court's decision culminated in dismissing the petition.

Table of Content
1. the matter is deemed infructuous, leading to petition dismissal. (Para 1)

JUDGMENT

1. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the matter has become infructuous. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 12574

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMM.A.ABDUL HAKHIM, JT.RAVINDRAN – AppellantVersusMANANTHAVADY GRAMA PANCHAYATH – RespondentWP(C) NO. 5892 OF 2015

The dismissal of a writ petition due to becoming infructuous concludes the need for judicial relief.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM, J
T.RAVINDRAN – Appellant
Versus
MANANTHAVADY GRAMA PANCHAYATH – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 5892 OF 2015