Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 12578

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
SUSHEELA P.P – Appellant
Versus
AUTHORIZED OFFICER CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA – Respondent
RP NO. 1443 OF 2025 | WP(C) NO.31281 OF 2025

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.C.K.SREEJITH
For the Respondents: SRI.K.M.ANEESH, SRI.ADARSH KUMAR, SRI.SHASHANK DEVAN

The court upheld the dismissal of the review petition as there was no apparent error in the previous decision.

Headnote:The judgment addresses the review petition against a prior decision in W.P.

(C) No.31281 of 2025, where the Court had ordered the petitioner to remit Rs. 2 Lakhs. The respondent bank claims the petitioner trespassed on secured assets, with a police complaint filed. The Court finds no apparent error to justify reviewing the earlier judgment. "The dismissal of the review will not prevent the petitioner from approaching the Bank to settle the dispute."

Table of Content
1. review petition concerning prior court order regarding financial remittance. (Para 1 , 2)
2. court finds no apparent error in the prior judgment. (Para 3)

MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J.

-------------------------------------------------

R.P. No.1443 of 2025 -------------------------------------------------

Dated this the 20^th day of February, 2026 ORDER The review is filed against the judgment dated 22.09.2025 in W.P.(C) No.31281 of 2025. This Court had passed an order on 10.11.2025, directing the petitioner to remit an amount of Rs. 2 Lakhs, which both sides submit, was remitted.

2. However, learned counsel for the Bank submits that, taking advantage of the order passed by this Court, the petitioner had trespassed on the secured asset regarding which a police complaint has already been filed. It will be open to the Bank to pursue the same.

3. After hearing both sides, I find no error apparent on the face of record to review the judgment, and accordingly, the review petition is rejected. The dismissal of the review will not prevent the petitioner from approaching the Bank to settle the dispute.

Subject to the above, the review petition is dismissed.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 12578

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMMOHAMMED NIAS C.P., JSUSHEELA P.P – AppellantVersusAUTHORIZED OFFICER CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA – RespondentRP NO. 1443 OF 2025 | WP(C) NO.31281 OF 2025

The court upheld the dismissal of the review petition as there was no apparent error in the previous decision.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
SUSHEELA P.P – Appellant
Versus
AUTHORIZED OFFICER CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA – Respondent
RP NO. 1443 OF 2025 | WP(C) NO.31281 OF 2025