IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
NISSAR V.K. – Appellant
Versus
THE JOINT REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER – Respondent
JUDGMENT
The writ petition is filed with the following prayers:-
(i) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order restraining the 1st respondent from proceeding further consequent to the issuance of Exhibit.P9 show cause notice issued by him proposing to cancel Exhibit.P1 driving licence issued in the name of the petitioner;
(ii) Petitioner may be permitted to dispense with the filing of translation of the vernacular documents; And (iii) To pass such orders or reliefs as this Hon’ble Court deems fit in the interest of justice.
2. The learned Government Pleader, on instructions, submits that no action will be taken on Ext.P11, without hearing the petitioner. This is recorded.
3. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to file his objections to Ext.P11 within two weeks from today. On receipt of the same, the 1st respondent will hear the petitioner and pass orders in accordance with law. It will be open to the petitioner to produce such materials to substantiate his contentions, which will be adverted to by the 1st respondent while taking a decision as directed above.
The Writ petition is disposed of as above.
Sd/-
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.