Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 12584

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
SEEBHAL MIKELIN DISTILLERY PVT LTD. – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 10817 OF 2020

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.BENOY K.KADAVAN, SHRI.SHYLESH KRISHNAN, KUM.K.S.SREEKALA
For the Respondents: SHRI.P.VIJAYAKUMAR, ASG OF INDIA, GOVERNMENT PLEADER

A petitioner’s failure to appear may result in the dismissal of the writ petition for default.

Headnote:The High Court of Kerala examined a writ petition concerning the operations of a distillery in light of various regulatory licenses. The petitioner, represented by authorized personnel, failed to appear in court, leading to the dismissal of the petition for default. The court concluded: 'the writ petition is dismissed for default.'

JUDGMENT

There was no appearance for the petitioner when this matter was taken up on 12.02.2026. Today also there is no appearance for the petitioner.

In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed for default.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 12584

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMMOHAMMED NIAS C.P., JSEEBHAL MIKELIN DISTILLERY PVT LTD. – AppellantVersusUNION OF INDIA – RespondentWP(C) NO. 10817 OF 2020

A petitioner’s failure to appear may result in the dismissal of the writ petition for default.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
SEEBHAL MIKELIN DISTILLERY PVT LTD. – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 10817 OF 2020