IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
SAJITH SAKSAN – Appellant
Versus
THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY – Respondent
JUDGMENT
The writ petition is filed with the following prayers:-
i. Issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ, order or direction restraining the 2nd respondent in convening timing conference in respect of Ext.P2 grant made by the 1st respondent and also restrain the 2nd respondent in issuing the regular permit to the 3rd respondent.
ii. Declare that the 3rd respondent is not entitled to get the regular permit issued, since, the 3rd respondent failed to produce the current records of stage carriage in time as per Rule 159(2) of the Kerala Motor Vehicle Rules .
iii. Grant the petitioner such other reliefs which this Hon’ble court deem just and fit in the circumstance of the case.
2. Taking note of the fact that Ext.P5 notice pertains to a meeting which was scheduled on 01.10.2024, at this distance of time, nothing remains to be considered in this writ petition.
Accordingly, the writ petition is closed, without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to challenge the orders, if any, passed in the said meeting, if so advised.
Sd/-
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.