IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V. KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
LEELAMMA GEORGE – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
JUDGMENT
This writ petition is filed with following prayers:
i. To issue a writ of certiorari or such other appropriate order or writ quashing Exhibit P4 and declare that the petitioner is not liable to pay any conversion fee for conversion of her Land mentioned in Exhibit P3 to dry land/purayidam.
ii. Issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other writ, order or direction, directing the 3rd respondent to pass appropriate orders on Ext P3 -Form 6 application for changing the nature of land to dry land/Purayidam without imposing any conversion fee, as expeditiously as possible.
iii. Any other appropriate, Writ, order or direction as deemed fit and proper by this Hon’ble Court to grant in the interests of justice.
iv. to dispense with the filing of the translation of the vernacular documents.
(SIC)
2. Petitioner is aggrieved by Ext.P4 communication by which the petitioner is directed to pay conversion fee of Rs.92,400/- for processing hte Form-6 application. The petitioner relied on the decisions reported in Shiji Joshy v. State of Kerala [2022 (7) KHC 502] and Reeta John v. State of Kerala [2023 KHC 9383].
3. Heard the learned Government Pleader also.
4. It is not in dispute that the point raised
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.