IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
RAJALAKSHMI K.R – Appellant
Versus
THRIKKAKARA MUNICIPALITY – Respondent
JUDGMENT
The above Writ Petition (C) is filed with the following prayers:
"(i). call for records leading to passing of Exhibits P7 and P9 orders from the 2nd respondent and quash Exhibits P7 and P9 orders, by issuing a Writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate Writ, Order or Direction.
(ii). Petitioner also prays that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to dispense with the English translation of the documents produced in the Vernacular Language.
And (iii). Issue such other reliefs as deem fit and proper by this Hon’ble Court in the facts and circumstances of the case "
[SIC]
2. The short point raised by the petitioner is that, Ext.P9 is an order passed without giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. When this writ petition came up for consideration before this Court on 11.02.2026, this Court directed the Standing Counsel to get instruction whether Ext.P9 is an order passed after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.
3. The learned Standing Counsel submitted that, Ext.P7 was issued after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. But, the Standing Counsel fairly submitted that, Ext.P9 is an order passed without giving an opportunity of hearing to the pe
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.