IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
VAHEEDA – Appellant
Versus
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR MALAPPURAM – Respondent
JUDGMENT
The above Writ Petition (C) is filed with the following prayers:
"i) Call for the records pertaining to Ext P5 and set aside the same ii) Issue a writ of mandamus, any other writ, appropriate order directing and declare that demanding conversion fees for the applied land (Ext P 3) is against the provisions of law.
iii) Issue a writ of mandamus, any other writ, appropriate order directing the 2nd Respondent/3rd respondent to complete the proceedings on Exhibit P3 (Form P6 application) submitted by the Petitioner within a time frame in the light of exhibit P5, without demanding fee for conversion.
iv) Petitioner also prays that this Honourable Court may be pleased to dispense with the translation of the vernacular documents produced in the vernacular language.
v) Such other relief’s that this Honourable Court may deem fit and proper to grant, in the interest of justice.
vi) Provide cost of the proceedings.”
[SIC]
2. The petitioner is aggrieved by Ext.P5 notice by which the petitioner is directed to pay conversion fee. The petitioner relied the judgment of this Court in The Revenue Divisional Officer v. Dr. A.V. Sajeev [ 2023 (4) KLT 331]. 3. Heard the learned counsel for the petit
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.