Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
M.B. SNEHALATHA, J
PRAKSH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. conviction based on evidence of rash and negligent driving. (Para 4 , 6) |
| 2. observations on the nature of evidence and court's reasoning on driving behaviors. (Para 5) |
| 3. arguments presented by both the prosecution and defense regarding evidence credibility. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. legal principles regarding rash driving and implications for conviction. (Para 11) |
O R D E R
In this criminal revision petition, challenge is to the judgment in Crl.A No.67/2017 of Sessions Court, Kollam, by which it confirmed the conviction and sentence against the revision petitioner/accused in C.C.No.226/2008 on the file of Judicial First Class Magistrate Court II, Kollam, for the offences punishable under Sections 279 , 337, 338 and 304A of IPC .
2. In brief, the prosecution case is that on 11.10.2007, at around
9.45 am, accused drove a lorry bearing registration No.KL01-X-2179 through Kottiyam-Chathannoor public road in a rash and negligent manner so as to endanger human life and when the lorry reached at Sithara junction, it hit on a motor cycle bearing registration No.KL2-V-1486 ridden by PW1 Thoufik, and thereafter it hit on an autorickshaw bearing registration No.KL16-C-4818. In the incid
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
