Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN, J
ANILKUMAR P.N. – Appellant
Versus
REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, MUVATTUPUZHA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court allows writ petition based on peaceful coexistence and lack of grievances. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
JUDGMENT
This writ petition is filed by the petitioner, who is the son of the second respondent, challenging Ext.P5 order passed by the first respondent under the provisions of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act , 2007, revoking Ext.P1 Settlement Deed.
2. When the matter was taken up for consideration on
10.02.2026, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the second respondent/senior citizen is residing with the petitioner peacefully and that the petitioner is taking care of her. There was no representation for the second respondent/senior citizen on 10.02.2026. Today also, there is no representation for the second respondent/senior citizen.
3. Hence, it has to be presumed that the second respondent is having no further grievances. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the second respondent is residing with the petitioner peacefully and also considering the fact that the petitioner has not opposed the submission made by the second respondent, I am of the opinion that the petitioner is en
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
