Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
SR. MARY N.J. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. request for registration based on qualifications. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. previous rulings declared government orders unconstitutional. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. petitioners' claims dismissed on legal grounds. (Para 8) |
COMMON JUDGMENT
Petitioners seek for a direction to the respondents to refrain from interfering in any manner with the practice of Naturopathy and Yoga Therapy by them not to harass them in their practice of the said discipline. A further direction is sought to take steps to provide Class B registration to the petitioners.
2. Petitioners claim that they are qualified hands, entitled to practice Naturopathy and Yoga, which are Alternative Systems of Medicine. Petitioners claim to have qualified in Naturopathy and Yoga Therapy from the Akhil Bharatiya Prakritik Chikitsa Parishad, which is stated to be a Government controlled association. Petitioners also claim that they have considerable experience in the practice of the specialised fields of Naturopathy and Yoga. Some of the petitioners claim that they have obtained Diploma in Naturopathy and Yoga Therapy from the Department of Adult and Continuing Education of MG University. According to the petitioners, despite
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
