Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
K. BABU, J
NASEEMA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks leave for son imprisoned. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. discussion on prisoner's good conduct report. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court emphasizes importance of societal ties in rehabilitation. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. court states adverse police report not sole reason to deny leave. (Para 7) |
| 5. court directs timely decision on leave application. (Para 8) |
K.BABU, J.
--------------------------------------
W.P (Crl) No.186 of 2026 ---------------------------------------
Dated this the 18th day of February, 2026 JUDGMENT The petitioner is the mother of Convict No.203/2023 of Central Prison and Correctional Home, Viyyur, who is undergoing life imprisonment. Petitioner's son is accused No.2 in S.C.No.329 of 2020 on the file of the Additional District and Sessions Court, Irinjalakuda. Since 16.10.2019, he has been undergoing sentence. The petitioner's son applied for ordinary leave under Rule 397 of the Kerala Prisons & Correctional Services (Management) Rules, 2014 (for short ‘the Rules’).
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner has taken me to the report of the Superintendent of the Prison concerned, wherein
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
