SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 12802

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
BLESSON SAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
BAIL APPL. NO. 732 OF 2026 | CRIME NO.31/2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.S.K.SAJI, SMT.MAYAMOL T.S., SHRI.SAGITH KUMAR V., SMT.DEVAPRIYA S., SMT.AADIYA
For the Respondents: SRI.M.C. ASHI

The court granted bail due to lack of evidence supporting prolonged detention under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

Headnote:This judgment concerns a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in relation to allegations of a violent crime involving the applicant. The prosecution claims intentional homicide against the applicant following a temple festival incident. The court's findings concluded there was insufficient evidence to justify continued detention, thus granting bail with specific conditions. The primary issue was whether the applicant's pre-trial detention was necessary, leading to the court’s decision stating the details of the bail conditions and granting bail.

Judgement Key Points

Case Summary: Bail Application No. 732 of 2026

Parties and Court Details
- Appellant/Petitioner: Blesson Sam. (!) (!)
- Respondent: State of Kerala. (!)
- Court: High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam, decided on 24-02-2026 by Dr. Kauser Edappagath, J. (!) (!) (!)
- Crime: No. 31/2026, Kurathikadu Police Station, Alappuzha District. (!)
- Bail sought under: Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS). (!)
- Offences alleged: Sections 351, 118(1), and 109 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. (!)

Facts of the Case
- Incident arose from animosity during a festival at Vettiyar temple between the applicant and the de facto complainant. (!)
- On 15.01.2026 at 10:45 pm near a canal at Thundiltharayilmukku, north of Vettiyar Temple, the applicant allegedly stabbed the complainant on the head and left hand muscle while the complainant was talking to a friend on a scooter, causing serious injuries with intent to commit murder. (!)
- Applicant remanded to judicial custody on 01.2026 (exact date incomplete in record). (!)

Arguments and Court's Assessment
- Applicant's counsel argued innocence, false implication, and lack of materials connecting applicant to the crime. (!)
- Prosecution argued incident was part of applicant's intentional criminal acts, opposing bail. (!)
- Court heard counsel for applicant (Sri. S.K. Saji) and Senior Public Prosecutor (Sri. M.C. Ashi), and perused case diary. (!)
- Investigation nearly complete, recovery effected, and applicant has no criminal antecedents. (!)
- No reason found for continued detention; insufficient evidence justifying prolonged pre-trial detention. (!)

Decision and Bail Conditions
- Bail granted. (!) (!)
- Conditions:
- Execute bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two solvent sureties to jurisdictional Magistrate/Court satisfaction. (!)
- Fully cooperate with investigation. (!)
- Appear before investigating officer 10:00-11:00 a.m. every Saturday and as required, until further orders. (!)
- Not commit similar offences while on bail. (!)
- Not contact prosecution witnesses, tamper with evidence, or influence witnesses/persons related to investigation. (!)
- Not leave Kerala without trial court permission. (!)
- Applications for modification/cancellation of conditions to be filed in jurisdictional court. (!)


Table of Content
1. the facts underlying the allegations against the applicant. (Para 2 , 3)
2. the court’s assessment of the evidence regarding bail. (Para 4)
3. conditions for bail and justification for granting it. (Para 5)

O R D E R

This application is filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023 (for short, BNSS ), seeking regular bail.

2. The applicant is the sole accused in Crime No.31/2026 of Kurathikadu Police Station, Alappuzha District. The offences alleged are punishable under Sections 351 , 118 (1) and 109 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita , 2023.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is as follows:- A police complaint was lodged by the defacto complainant with respect to the commotion that occurred between him and the applicant during a festival at the Vettiyar temple. Due to that animosity, he, with the intention of committing murder of the defacto complainant by inflicting fatal injuries, on 15.01.2026 at 10:45 pm, at a place near to the canal situated at Thundiltharayilmukku, north of Vettiyar Temple, while he was talking to one of his friends on the scooter, stabbed on his head and left hand muscle portion with a knife, causing serious injuries and thereby committed the offences.

4. I have heard Sri.S.K.Saji, the learned counsel for the applicant and Sri.M.C.Ashi, the learned Senior Public Prosecutor. Perused the case diary.

5. The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. The counsel further submitted that no materials are on record to connect the applicant with the alleged crime; hence, he is entitled to bail. On the other hand, the learned Senior Public Prosecutor submitted that the alleged incident occurred as a part of the intentional criminal acts of the applicant, and he is not entitled to bail at this stage.

6. The applicant was remanded to judicial custody on

16.01.2026. The investigation is almost over and the recovery has been effected. The applicant has no criminal antecedents. For these reasons, I do not find any reason to hold that the continued detention of the applicant is required for any purpose. Hence, the applicant is entitled to be released on bail.

In the result, the application is allowed on the following conditions: -

(i) The applicant shall be released on bail on executing a bond for Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One lakh only) with two solvent sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional Magistrate/Court.

(ii) The applicant shall fully co-operate with the investigation.

(iii) The applicant shall appear before the investigating officer between 10.00 a.m and 11.00 a.m. every Saturday until further orders. He shall also appear before the investigating officer as and when required.

(iv) The applicant shall not commit any offence of a like nature while on bail.

(v) The applicant shall not attempt to contact any of the prosecution witnesses, directly or through any other person, or in any other way try to tamper with the evidence or influence any witnesses or other persons related to the investigation.

(vi) The applicant shall not leave the State of Kerala without the permission of the trial Court.

(vii) The application, if any, for deletion/modification of the bail conditions or cancellation of bail on the grounds of violating the bail conditions shall be filed at the jurisdictional court.

Sd/-

DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, JUDGE

APA

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top