Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 12829

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
HARISANKAR V. MENON, J
KAMAL DEV M.V. – Appellant
Versus
THE MANAGER, UNION BANK OF INDIA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 272 OF 2023

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.T.MADHU, SMT.C.R.SARADAMANI, SRI.SHAHID AZEEZ, SRI.RENJISH S. MENON
For the Respondents: SMT.SYLAJA S.L.

The court determined that a One-Time Settlement rendered the writ petition unnecessary and thus closed the case.

Headnote:The petitioner issues a One-Time Settlement against the bank's claims, leading to an agreement that renders the current writ petition unnecessary. The Court finds that the issue is resolved, leading to the case being deemed infructuous. Thus, it concludes that the petition is closed. Writ petition closed as infructuous.

J U D G M E N T

The learned counsel for the 1^st respondent states that the issue has been settled by the petitioner through the One-Time Settlement (OTS) scheme.

In the light of the above submission, this writ petition would stand closed as infructuous.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 12829

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMHARISANKAR V. MENON, JKAMAL DEV M.V. – AppellantVersusTHE MANAGER, UNION BANK OF INDIA – RespondentWP(C) NO. 272 OF 2023

The court determined that a One-Time Settlement rendered the writ petition unnecessary and thus closed the case.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
HARISANKAR V. MENON, J
KAMAL DEV M.V. – Appellant
Versus
THE MANAGER, UNION BANK OF INDIA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 272 OF 2023