Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
RAGESH.R – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's request for employment consideration. (Para 1) |
| 2. court acknowledges the urgency of the situation. (Para 2) |
| 3. court directs consideration of representation in the board meeting. (Para 3) |
JUDGMENT
The above Writ Petition (C) is filed with the following prayers:
"i. To declare that the petitioner is entitled to be absorbed/appointed as Direct Contract Worker (DCW) in the Titanium Sponge Plant (TSP) Unit of the 2nd respondent by treating him as an employee engaged through the 5th respondent considering his “evictee” status.
ii. To issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 4 to absorb/appoint the petitioner as Direct Contract Worker (DCW) in the Titanium Sponge Plant (TSP) Unit of the 2nd respondent by treating him as an employee engaged through the 5th respondent and by also considering his “evictee” status, while implementing Ext P7.
iii. To issue a mandamus directing the 2nd respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext P8 representation submitted by the petitioner placing the same before the Board of Directors of the 2nd respondent before taking final decision on Ext P7 and affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.
iv
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
