SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 12842

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
VIJU ABRAHAM, J
LATHA MANGESH V.L. – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL EDUCATION (HSE), GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 28274 OF 2021



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: S.SUBHASH CHAND
For the Respondents: M.UNNIKRISHNAN, NARAYANI HARIKRISHNAN, GP RIYAL DEVASSY

The court mandated a decision on the retirement benefits request within three months, emphasizing due consideration to supporting documents.

Headnote:The judgment addresses the statutory provisions concerning educator retirement benefits, with the petitioner, a retired higher secondary school teacher, seeking the resolution of her representation for retirement benefits after the government declined her regularization request. The court directed the government to review her representation (Ext.P26) within three months, recognizing the need for due consideration of any supporting documentation presented.

Table of Content
1. challenge to government order regarding regularization. (Para 1)
2. petitioner's request for urgent resolution of retirement benefits. (Para 2)

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 24th day of February, 2026 Above writ petition is filed challenging Ext.P22 order passed by the Government, whereby the request for regularisation has been declined.

2. Petitioner submits that she has since retired from service and therefore she is limiting her relief for an expeditious disposal of Ext.P26, wherein the petitioner has sought for retirement benefits/ex gratia payment.

3. Heard the learned Government Pleader also.

After hearing both sides, I am inclined to dispose of the writ petition with a direction to the 1st respondent to take up Ext.P26 representation submitted by the petitioner and pass appropriate orders thereon, after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner within an outer limit of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Petitioner will be free to produce documents and judgments in support of her contentions, which shall be duly looked into by the Government while taking a decision as directed above.

Sd/-

VIJU ABRAHAM JUDGE sbk/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top