Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
NIDHIN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. charges relate to murder with common intention. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. bail granted considering conditions and prior detention. (Para 4) |
| 3. arguments pertain to false implication and insufficient evidence. (Para 5 , 6) |
2026:KER:15950 O R D E R These two bail applications are connected and hence they are disposed of by a common order. They are filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023 (for short, BNSS ) seeking regular bail.
2. These bail applications pertain to Crime No.294/2025 of Chengamanad Police Station, Ernakulam District. The applicant in B.A.No.14271 of 2025 is the accused No.1 and the applicant in B.A.No.144 of 2026 is the accused No.2 in the above said crime. The offence alleged is punishable under Section 302 r/w Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code , 1860.
3. The prosecution case, in short, is that the accused, in furtherance of their common intention to murder Sri. Vinu Vikraman, had on 10.04.2024 at 1.15 a.m., restrained him and inflicted injuries using a sword, resulting in the injured succumbing to his injuries and thereby committed the
2026:KER:15950 offence.
4. I have heard the learned counsel for the applicants and the learn
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
