SHANET vs STATE OF KERALA - 2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 12864

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 12864

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
SHANET – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.ALEX K.JOHN, SHRI.ARUN K.V., SMT.FIDA HUSNA P.P., SMT.ANUSREE S. KUMAR, STM.SREENU RAJ N., SHRI.NITHIN C. REGI, SHRI.NINAN THOMAS, SHRI.GEGO GEORGE, SMT.REENA JACOB, SHRI.MUHAMMED ZAIN
For the Respondents: SRI K A NOUSHAD(SR PP)

ORDER The learned counsel for the applicant seeks permission to withdraw the bail application with liberty to approach the Sessions Court.

2. Permission is granted.

Accordingly, the bail application is dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 12864

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMDR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, JSHANET – AppellantVersusSTATE OF KERALA – Respondent

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
SHANET – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent