Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 12879

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
MIRSHAD.P – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
BAIL APPL. NO. 982 OF 2026 | CRIME NO.82/2025

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.G.HARIHARAN, SRI.PRAVEEN.H, SMT.K.S.SMITHA, SRI.V.R.SANJEEV KUMAR, SMT.AFNA V.P., SHRI.V.ROHITH
For the Respondents: ADV M C ASHI, SR.P.P

The court permitted the withdrawal of the bail application without opposition, leading to its dismissal.

Headnote:In this bail application, the petitioner sought to withdraw their plea. The request was granted by the court, resulting in the application being dismissed as withdrawn. key considerations included the absence of any opposition to the withdrawal from the respondents. Ultimately, the court concluded by granting permission to withdraw the application, dismissing it accordingly.

O R D E R

The learned counsel for the applicant seeks permission to withdraw the bail application. Permission is granted.

Accordingly, the bail application is dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 12879

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMDR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, JMIRSHAD.P – AppellantVersusSTATE OF KERALA – RespondentBAIL APPL. NO. 982 OF 2026 | CRIME NO.82/2025

The court permitted the withdrawal of the bail application without opposition, leading to its dismissal.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
MIRSHAD.P – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
BAIL APPL. NO. 982 OF 2026 | CRIME NO.82/2025