SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 12883

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
RASHEED – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
BAIL APPL. NO. 8769 OF 2025 | CRIME NO.673/2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.SREEJITH S. NAIR, SHRI.SASTHAMANGALAM S. AJITHKUMAR (SR.), SRI.SATHEESH MOHANAN, SMT.MAHIMA
For the Respondents: SMT SREEJA V (SR PP)

A bail application can be dismissed as infructuous if the applicant has already been released on regular bail.

Headnote:The application was filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking regular bail. The applicant had been previously released on regular bail by the Sessions Court, rendering the prayer infructuous. The Court dismissed the bail application as infructuous. Finality of the bail was affirmed, thus concluding the proceedings.

Table of Content
1. an application for bail under section 483 of the bnss. (Para 1)
2. the bail application was deemed infructuous. (Para 2)

O R D E R

This application is filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023 (for short, BNSS ), seeking regular bail.

2. The learned Senior Public Prosecutor on instructions submits that the applicant was already released on regular bail by the Sessions Court. Hence, the prayer has become infructuous.

Accordingly, the bail application is dismissed as infructuous.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top