The Court has the discretion to reduce bail penalties based on the financial circumstances of the sureties.

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 23^rd day of February, 2026 The sureties in S.C.No.836/2023 on the files of the Additional Sessions Court-I, Thalassery, have filed this appeal under Section 495 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the appellants and the learned Public Prosecutor in detail and perused the order impugned.

3. Precisely stating, the appellants herein stood as sureties for releasing the accused in this case before trial court and thereafter, due to non-appearance of the accused before the trial court, the bail bond executed by the appellants along with the accused has been forfeited.

4. As held in Thundichi v. State of Kerala [2009(4) KLT 67] , on forfeiture of the bond, the accused would be produced by the sureties or the accused was later arrested would not save the sureties from paying the forfeited amount of penalty, though leniency in the quantum of penalty can be considered. Thus, the learned counsel for the appellants pleaded mercy in the matter of penalty, under the submission that the appellants are doing coolie works. The learned Public Prosecutor conceded for reasonable deduction in the penalty pointing out the fact that the actual forfeited amount was Rs.50,000/- each.

5. Since reduction of the penalty amount alone is the matter to be considered by this Court, in the interest of justice, the penalty imposed by the court at Rs.50,000/- each is reduced to Rs.15,000/- each. There will be a direction to the appellants to pay the amount before the Additional Sessions Court-I, Thalassery, on or before 05.03.2026. It is specifically made clear that if the penalty will not be remitted within the said period, the appellants are bound to pay the entire amount, covered by the order impugned. This appeal stands allowed as indicated above.

Registry is directed to forward a copy of this judgment to the Additional Sessions Court-I, Thalassery, forthwith.