SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 12901

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ANIL K. NARENDRAN, MURALEE KRISHNA S., JJ
K.T.MUHAMMED ALI – Appellant
Versus
MARAKKARUTTY. T.E – Respondent
RP NO. 137 OF 2026 | WA NO.2816 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.S.KRISHNAMOORTHY, SMT.SNEHA ROSE, SMT.P.S.ARUNA, SRI.D.SREEKUMAR
For the Respondents: SRI. PREMCHAND R. NAIR, GP, SRI. JAMSHED HAFIZ, SC, WAQF BOARD

Review petitions under Order XLVII and Section 114 of the CPC facilitate correction of errors apparent in judgments.

Headnote:This review petition, under Order XLVII Rule 1 and Section 114 of the Code of Civil Procedure, was filed to address alleged errors in the judgment dated 23.01.2026 regarding W.A.No.2816 of 2025. The court set aside prior orders and allowed parties to expedite the final disposal. The petition was withdrawn upon counsel's request. Hence, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Result: 'the review petition is dismissed as withdrawn.'

Table of Content
1. application of review petition principles under the cpc. (Para 1)
2. court's directives for expedited disposal of cases. (Para 2)
3. withdrawal of review petition leads to dismissal. (Para 3)

ORDER

Muralee Krishna, J.

This review petition is filed by the 1st respondent in W.A.No.2816 of 2025 under Order XLVII Rule 1 read with Section 114 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 , claiming that there is an error apparent on the face of the record in the judgment dated

23.01.2026 passed by this Court in the writ appeal.

2. By the common judgment dated 23.01.2026, this Court allowed W.A.No.2816 of 2025 along with W.A.No.34 of 2026, by setting aside the impugned order dated 01.04.2025 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.(C)No.13024 of 2025 and the order dated 18.11.2025 in I.A.No.2 of 2025 in that writ petition. This Court made it clear that parties to the writ appeals may seek the final disposal of W.P.(C)No.13024 of 2025 before the learned Single Judge expeditiously, pointing out the urgency and the pendency of the lis before the Wakf Board as well as the Wakf Tribunal.

3. Today, when this review petition is taken up for consideration, after arguing for some time, the learned counsel for the review petitioner sought permission to withdraw the review petition.

In view of the aforesaid submission made by the learned counsel, the review petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top