SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 12902

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ANIL K. NARENDRAN, MURALEE KRISHNA S., JJ
CANARA BANK – Appellant
Versus
E.T. FIROZ – Respondent


Muralee Krishna S., J.

Respondents 2 and 3 in W.P.(C)No.3068 of 2025 filed this writ appeal under Section 5 (i) of the Kerala High Court Act , 1958, challenging the judgment dated 08.10.2025 passed by the learned Single Judge in that writ petition.

2. The 1st respondent-writ petitioner filed W.P.(C)No.3068 of 2025 under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following reliefs;

“a. Issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order, or direction quashing Ext.P7 attachment order dated 13.01.2025 issued by the 1st respondent;

b. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order, or direction directing the 1st respondent to refrain from interfering with the custody or disposition of the pre-deposit amount held by the Hon’ble Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT), Chennai, in RA(SA)No.5 of 2024;

c. Direct the Hon’ble DRAT, Chennai, to release the pre-deposit amount of Rs.3,95,50,000/- (Rupees Three Crores Ninety-Five Lakhs Fifty Thousand Only) to the petitioner forthwith, as the appeal in RA(SA)No.5 of 2024 has been dismissed and no lawful appropriation or attachment of the pre-deposit has occurred.”

3. Going by the pleadings in the writ petition, t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top