SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 12907

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
ANILKUMAR A.P @ ANIL PHILIP – Appellant
Versus
KERALA WATER AUTHORITY – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 2021 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.MANU ROY
For the Respondents: SHRI.SUJITH MATHEW JOSE, SHRI.GEORGIE JOHNY

Court upheld the respondents' actions to enhance water supply addressing the petitioner’s grievances, asserting that adequate measures were in place.

Headnote:The petitioner sought relief for a permanent solution to insufficient water supply. The respondents stated that appropriate measures were taken, including enhancing supply and future pipeline installation. The petitioner is presently receiving adequate water, redressing his grievance. The court framed the issue as whether sufficient measures have been implemented for water supply. The court reasoned that actions taken by the respondents adequately addressed the petitioner’s concerns, confirming their effectiveness. Consequently, the writ petition is closed.

Table of Content
1. petition for relief on water supply. (Para 1 , 2)
2. respondents' measures effectively address water issues. (Para 3 , 4)

JUDGMENT

The petitioner sought for the following reliefs:

“(I) Issue a Writ of Mandamus or such other appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, directing the respondents to make a permanent solution to supply sufficient drinking water to the house of the petitioner within such time fixed by this Hon’ble Court.

(II) To dispense with the English translation of documents produced in vernacular language (III) Issue such other Writ, appropriate Order or Direction as this Hon’ble Court deem fit to the facts and circumstances of the case.”

2. The grievance of the petitioner raised in this writ petition is with respect to lack of sufficient water supply to the house of the petitioner.

3. A statement has been filed on behalf of the respondents pointing out that, at present, there are no issues but in order to increase the water supply to the Nettoor area, Water Authority has already provided additional tapping of existing line and even provided three additional air vents and line boosting meetings. It is further mentioned in the statement as follows:

“6. Therefore, an additional tapping from 300 AC pipeline at Nettoor SN Junction to the existing 160mm PVC pipe by using 140mm PVC pipe has been introduced to tackle the current crisis affected in this area. By this work, the supply level has enhanced to a higher extent. Petitioner is not facing any issues presently.

7. As a permanent solution, it is proposed to lay a 160mm HDPE pipeline through the backwaters to supply water to Nettoor area with the financial aid of Maradu Municipality. Maradu Municipality has promised to fund this work, vide their Letter No: E4- 3146704-2025, dated 05.02.2026. On completion of this proposed work, the water scarcity affected in the petitioner’s residential area can be solved. It is submitted that at present, the petitioner is getting potable water as per his requirement.”

4. It is evident from the above statement that respondents are initiating appropriate steps to redress the grievance of the petitioner and other locals. In the light of the above statement, the grievance of the petitioner stands redressed.

Accordingly, this writ petition is closed.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top