SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 12908

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
GOKUL P.V – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.K.P.SREEKUMAR, SRI.P.M.SATHEESH

JUDGMENT

Petitioner challenges the refusal of the 4th respondent to issue a K-TET category III certificate, despite successfully passing the examinations of B.Tech. and B-Ed.

2. By judgment in WP(C) No.14090 of 2024, this Court had declared that the qualification of B-Tech and B-Ed Degree would be a sufficient qualification for obtaining a certificate in K-TET category III. It was also directed that the petitioners therein, who were similarly placed as the petitioner in the instant case be issued with the K-TET category III certificates, subject to the marks scored by them in the said examination.

3. The learned Government Pleader, upon instructions, submitted that the judgment mentioned above covers the present issue and that the petitioner stands on a similar footing as the petitioners therein.

In view of the above, this writ petition is disposed of declaring that the petitioner is entitled to get K-TET category III certificate and the 3rd respondent is directed to issue K-TET category III certificate to the petitioner, subject to the marks scored by him in the said examination, at the earliest, at any rate, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top