IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C. JAYACHANDRAN, J
GIGI JOSE – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
J U D G M E N T
Dated this the 23rd day of February, 2026 The short grievance of the petitioner is that Ext.P3 arbitration application, which was filed in the month of June, 2024, has not been considered by the 5th respondent/
District Collector.
2. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Central Government Counsel for respondents 1, 3 & 4 and the learned Government Pleader on behalf of other respondents, this Court directs the 5th respondent to consider and pass Orders in Ext.P3 in accordance with law, expeditiously, at any rate, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The petitioner will produce a copy of the judgment before the 5th respondent, for compliance. Needless to say that, all procedural formalities, including the opportunity of being heard to the petitioner, as also, the concerned among respondents, shall be afforded by the 5th respondent, before taking a call in Ext.P3. The impact and evidential value of Exts.P6 and P7 shall necessarily be considered by the 5th respondent, while deciding the issue.
The Writ Petitions will stand disposed of, as above.
Sd/-
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.