IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C. JAYACHANDRAN, J
AKHIL SHAJI – Appellant
Versus
THE VILLAGE OFFICER – Respondent
J U D G M E N T
Dated this the 23rd day of February, 2026 In both these writ petitions, the petitioner's vehicles were seized, alleging violation of the Kerala Minor Mineral Concession Rules , 2015, as also, the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act , 1957. Although the petitioner would dispute the charges levelled against him, he is inclined to compound the offence, for which he approached the 4th respondent. However, he is not acting in terms of law, is the short grievance.
2. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, as also, the learned Government Pleader, this Court directs the 3rd respondent to produce the respective vehicles in these Writ Petitions before the 4th respondent, and there will be a consequential direction to the 4th respondent to compound the offence in accordance with law. The first above direction to produce the vehicles before the 4th respondent shall be complied with by the 3rd respondent within a period of three days from today (23.02.2026). The second direction to compound shall be complied with, within a period of one week from the date of such production.
The Writ Petitions will stand disposed of, as above.
Sd/-
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.