SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 12922

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C. PRATHEEP KUMAR, J
NOUSHAD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
CRL.MC NO. 6671 OF 2023



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: P.ANOOP
For the Respondents: C.SEENA

The court may dismiss a case for non-prosecution if the appellants fail to appear despite prior orders.

Headnote:The Court examined the criminal miscellaneous case and found the petitioners absent without representation, leading the Court to dismiss the application due to non-prosecution. The relevant legal requirement for representation was not met by the petitioners, resulting in the dismissal.

O R D E R

(Dated this the 23rd day of February, 2026)

The petitioner is absent. There is no representation for the petitioner. During the previous posting date also, there was no representation. Steps were also not taken as directed.

Therefore, this Crl.MC is dismissed for non prosecution.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

App_Store_Badge Google_Play_Store

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon Instagram Icon Twitter Icon

Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.

whatsapp-icon