SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 12929

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
VIJISH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.M.R.SARIN
For the Respondents: SRI.M.P.PRASANTH, PP

O R D E R

Dated this the 23rd day of February, 2026 The petitioner is the original 2nd accused in Crime No.105/2008 registered by the Parippally Police Station, Kollam, against three accused persons, alleging the commission of the offences punishable under Sections 465 , 471, 279, 337, 338 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 39 read with Section 192 and 146 read with Section 196 of the Motor Vehicles Act . The case against the petitioner was split up and the trial as against the accused 1 and 3 was conducted by the Court of the Judicial First Class Magistrate, South Paravur (‘Trial Court’, in short) as C.C.No.456/2008 and, by Annexure A3 judgment, the said accused persons were acquitted. Subsequently, the case against the petitioner is re-

numbered as C.C.No.291/2019.

2. The crux of the prosecution case is that;

The 1st accused had purchased a Motorcycle bearing Registration No.MH 31 AY 6415 from PW5 and altered the number of the vehicle by placing a forged number plate which exhibited the number of the vehicle as KL 2M 213. Subsequently, he sold the vehicle to the 2nd accused, who bought it with the knowledge that the registration was forged. Subsequently, on

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top