SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 12941

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
GIRISH – Appellant
Versus
SURESH – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.RAJESH SIVARAMANKUTTY
For the Respondents: SR.PP. SRI.C.S.HRITHWIK

O R D E R Dated this the 23rd day of February, 2026 The petitioner is the accused in S.T.No.976/2021 on the file of the Court of the Judicial First Class Magistrate-I, Chittur, (Trial Court), which has been filed by the 1st respondent alleging the commission of the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 ( for short, N.I.Act).

2. The petitioner has stated in the Criminal Miscellaneous Case that, 1st respondent has filed a complaint against the petitioner alleging that he had borrowed Rs.1,65,000/- on the assurance of returning the amount immediately. Subsequently, the petitioner issued a cheque for the above amount by putting his signature in the presence of the complainant. The cheque on presentation to the bank, got dishonored and the present complaint has been filed. During the cross examination of the 1st respondent ( PW1), it was brought out that PW1 does not pay income tax. Further, the entries in the cheque were not written by the petitioner. There are differences in the writings in the cheque and the petitioner’s signature. In the aforesaid circumstances, the petitioner filed an application to refer the cheque to a handwriting expert.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top